Abstract
Rapid tips to improve the quality of science
Highlights
There are many reports, papers, websites, videos, and other communications showing the importance of the quality of writing to publish the results of research projects in high-quality journals
Researchers should know what not good science is. They must be sure what the difference between good science and bad science is! BELUZ (2013) listed six red flags to watch for that tell the difference
Any extrapolation on effects under field conditions should be read with a critical gaze
Summary
There are many reports, papers, websites, videos, and other communications showing the importance of the quality of writing to publish the results of research projects in high-quality journals. The second question is on whether the treatment that the study looked at is consistent with the way it would exist in the real world (BELUZ 2013). Other point is that larger studies generally involve different research teams with high skill levels, knowledge, background, and wisdom (as a consequence).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
