Abstract

The objective of the study was to see whether a rapid method of pleurodesis was superior to the standard protocol in patients with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion. Between January 2000 and February 2003, a prospective randomised trial was carried out in a sequential sample of 27 patients with malignant pleural effusions documented cytopathologically. Twelve patients were allocated to group 1 (standard protocol) and 15 to group 2 (new protocol). A small-bore catheter (12 Fr) and oxytetracycline (35 mg/kg of body weight) were used in both groups. In group 1, patients had drainage until radiological evidence of lung re-expansion was obtained and the amount of fluid drained was less than 150 ml/day, before oxytetracycline was instilled. The catheter was removed when the amount of fluid drained after instillation was less than 150 ml/day. In group 2, patients had the oxytetracycline instilled in a fractionated-dose manner following frequent aspirations at 6h intervals. The catheter was removed when the total amount of fluid drained after instillation of the oxytetracycline [OT] was less than 150 ml/last three aspirations. Response was evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months after pleurodesis. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic features, site of the primary tumour, disease characteristics, and response rates in any evaluation period in both groups (P>0.05). However, the number of days of drainage and hospitalisation, and the cost were significantly lower in the second group (P<0.001). This new pleurodesis method provided shorter hospital stay resulting in superior cost-effectiveness and palliation without sacrificing the efficacy of pleurodesis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call