Abstract

Frozen section is a time- and labor-intensive method for intraoperative pathologic diagnosis. As a result, there exists a need to expedite and streamline the acquisition and interpretation of diagnostic histologic data to inform surgical decision making. Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) is an emerging technology that may serve to expedite the acquisition and interpretation of histologic data in the operating room. A blinded, prospective cohort study of 82 patients undergoing resection for tumors of the central nervous system was performed. Twenty-six patients with diagnoses of meningioma on SRH, frozen, or permanent section were included in this subanalysis. Diagnostic time and accuracy of stimulated SRH histology images were compared with the gold standard (frozen section). Agreement of SRH and frozen section diagnosis with permanent section (true) diagnosis was also compared. Mean time-to-diagnosis was significantly shorter for SRH-mediated diagnosis compared with frozen section (9.2 vs. 35.8, P < 0.0001). Diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between methods (P= 0.15). Diagnostic agreement was not significantly different between SRH versus frozen, SRH versus permanent, or frozen versus permanent section methods (P= 0.5, P= 0.5, P= 1.00). SRH is a promising adjuvant technology that may expedite intraoperative neuropathologic consult without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.