Abstract

The yeast endoplasmic reticulum has three distinct protein translocation channels. The heterotrimeric Sec61 and Ssh1 complexes, which bind translating ribosomes, mediate cotranslational translocation of proteins targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and SRP receptor targeting pathway, whereas the heptameric Sec complex has been proposed to mediate ribosome-independent post-translational translocation of proteins with less hydrophobic signal sequences that escape recognition by the SRP. However, multiple reports have proposed that the Sec complex may function cotranslationally and be involved in translocation or integration of SRP-dependent protein translocation substrates. To provide insight into these conflicting views, we induced expression of the tobacco etch virus protease to achieve rapid inactivation of the Sec complex by protease-mediated cleavage within the cytoplasmic domain of the Sec63 protein. Protein translocation assays conducted after tobacco etch virus protease induction revealed a complete block in translocation of two well-characterized substrates of the Sec complex, carboxypeptidase Y (CPY) and Gas1p, when the protease cleavage sites were located at structural domain boundaries in Sec63. However, integration of SRP-dependent membrane protein substrates was not detectably impacted. Moreover, redirecting CPY to the cotranslational pathway by increasing the hydrophobicity of the signal sequence rendered translocation of CPY insensitive to inactivation of the Sec complex. We conclude that the Sec complex is primarily responsible for the translocation of yeast secretome proteins with marginally hydrophobic signal sequences.

Highlights

  • The yeast endoplasmic reticulum has three distinct protein translocation channels

  • Rapid inactivation of yeast signal recognition particle (SRP) combined with endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-specific ribosome profiling indicated that ribosomes synthesizing SRPindependent substrates remained ER localized in SRPdeficient cells [17], whereas mRNAs encoding ER-targeted integral membrane proteins were mislocalized to the mitochondria

  • As this project was initiated before the structure of the Sec complex was solved by cryo-EM [18, 19], the design of the protease insertion sites was based upon an alignment between yeast Sec63p and the DExD/H helicase Brr2, which contains two Sec63-like domains [36]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The yeast endoplasmic reticulum has three distinct protein translocation channels. The heterotrimeric Sec61 and Ssh1 complexes, which bind translating ribosomes, mediate cotranslational translocation of proteins targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and SRP receptor targeting pathway, whereas the heptameric Sec complex has been proposed to mediate ribosome-independent post-translational translocation of proteins with less hydrophobic signal sequences that escape recognition by the SRP. Yeast strains that contain plasmids encoding wildtype or mutant alleles of Sec63p (Δ35 and Δ52) were first tested for growth in the absence of β-estradiol to determine whether the inserted TEV protease cleavage sites in Sec63 cause a detectable growth defect for cells grown on synthetic defined media (synthetic minimal media containing dextrose [SD]).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call