Abstract

Animal agriculture contributes significantly to global warming through ongoing emissions of the potent greenhouse gases methane and nitrous oxide, and displacement of biomass carbon on the land used to support livestock. However, because estimates of the magnitude of the effect of ending animal agriculture often focus on only one factor, the full potential benefit of a more radical change remains underappreciated. Here we quantify the full “climate opportunity cost” of current global livestock production, by modeling the combined, long-term effects of emission reductions and biomass recovery that would be unlocked by a phaseout of animal agriculture. We show that, even in the absence of any other emission reductions, persistent drops in atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide levels, and slower carbon dioxide accumulation, following a phaseout of livestock production would, through the end of the century, have the same cumulative effect on the warming potential of the atmosphere as a 25 gigaton per year reduction in anthropogenic CO2emissions, providing half of the net emission reductions necessary to limit warming to 2°C. The magnitude and rapidity of these potential effects should place the reduction or elimination of animal agriculture at the forefront of strategies for averting disastrous climate change.

Highlights

  • The use of animals as a food-production technology has well-recognized negative impacts on our climate

  • We compared various hypothetical dietary perturbations to a “business as usual” (BAU) reference in which emissions remain fixed at 2019 levels, based on global emissions data from FAOSTAT [27]

  • The dietary scenarios include the immediate replacement of all animal agriculture with a plant-only diet (IMM-plant only diet (POD)), a more gradual transition, over a period of 15 years, to a plantonly diet (PHASE-POD), and versions of each where only specific animal products were replaced

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of animals as a food-production technology has well-recognized negative impacts on our climate. The historical reduction in terrestrial biomass as native ecosystems were transformed to support grazing livestock and the cultivation of feed and forage crops accounts for as much as a third of all anthropogenic CO2 emissions to date [1, 2]. Especially large ruminants, and their supply chains, contribute significantly to anthropogenic emissions of the potent greenhouse gases (GHGs) methane and nitrous oxide [3,4,5]. Ending animal agriculture would stabilize GHGs and offset 68 percent of CO2 emissions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call