Rapid Determination of Soil Horizons and Suborders Based on VIS-NIR-SWIR Spectroscopy and Machine Learning Models

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

In an effort to improve the efficiency of soil classification, traditional methods are being combined with analytical and computational techniques. This integration has strengthened the connection between conventional classification and the application of machine-learning (ML) models to interpret soil spectral reflectance data. Due to the time and computational cost, several studies are limited to testing the classification performance of a few algorithms and do not always explore the best parameters for model optimization. The study aims to assess the efficiency of combining soil spectral reflectance with prevalent ML models for classifying pedogenetic horizons and soil suborders, enhancing traditional classification methods. We collected seven soil monoliths, previously classified according to the Brazilian Soil Classification System (SiBCS) and soil taxonomy. Using the ASD Fieldspec spectroradiometer, we obtained spectral reflectance samples along each monolith (n = 800 per monolith) to classify horizons and n = 5600 for suborder classification. Spectral fingerprints were obtained and explored by Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The spectral data were subdivided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets and submitted to the Logistic Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (NN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting (GB) models for the classification of horizons and suborders, considering the model’s adjustment parameters. Accuracy and F-Score were used to verify the performance of the models. There was a significant influence of particle size and soil organic carbon on the spectral fingerprint of the soils. The PCA indicated that topsoil horizons clustered in most of the monoliths analyzed, while most of the subsoil horizons showed data overlap. The NN model showed the highest accuracy in the classification of horizons (97%), while the SVM showed the lowest performance (52% accuracy). The classification of soil suborders presented accuracies between 95% and 98%. Therefore, our study concludes that spectral data combined with ML models can enhance the discrimination and classification of soil horizons and suborders, improving upon traditional methods.