Abstract

PurposeThe rapid detection of carbapenemases among Enterobacterales in clinical laboratories is critical for management of patients, and infection prevention and control efforts. MethodsA study was designed to evaluate the performances of the RAPIDEC CARBA NP®, β-CARBA®, NG-Test CARBA 5®, modified carbapenem-inactivation method, and EDTA version (eCIM) assays against a global collection of Enterobacterales (n = 216) with diverse carbapenemases. ResultsThe RAPIDEC CARBA NP® assay had a sensitivity of 98.6% and specificity of 19.6% and β-CARBA® a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 97.8%, but showed low sensitivity with Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC)-containing isolates. The NG-Test CARBA 5® had an overall sensitivity of 96.3% and specificity of 100% and failed to detect isolates with blaIMP-13, blaIMP-14. The eCIM gave false- positive results with Oxacillinase (OXA)-48–like enzymes. ConclusionThe NG-Test CARBA 5® assay was technically simple and provided rapid accurate results on the types of carbapenemases. Such information has potential treatment benefits for patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.