Abstract

Background: Rapid and reliable diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) represents a diagnostic challenge in compartmentalized extrapulmonary TB infection because of the small number of mycobacteria (MTB) and the frequent lack of fresh samples to perform culture. Here, we estimate the performances of homemade droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based assays against culture in 89 biopsies, for those fresh and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) subsamples were available.Methods: MTB diagnosis in fresh subsamples was performed by culture. Fresh subsamples were also analyzed for acid-fast bacilli smear-microscopy (AFB) and Xpert® MTB/RIF (Xpert). MTB examination was repeated in blind in the 89 FFPE subsamples by in-house ddPCR assays targeting the IS6110 and rpoB. Analytical sensitivity of ddPCR assays was evaluated using serial dilution of H37Rv strain. Limit of detection (LOD) was calculated by probit analysis. Results were expressed in copies/106 cells.Results: IS6110 and rpoB ddPCR assays showed a good linear correlation between expected and observed values (R2: 0.9907 and 0.9743, respectively). Probit analyses predicted a LOD of 17 and 40 copies/106 cells of MTB DNA for IS6110 and rpoB, respectively. Of the 89 biopsies, 68 were culture positive and 21 were culture negative. Considering mycobacterial culture as reference method, IS6110 assay yielded positive results in 67/68 culture-positive samples with a median interquartile range (IQR) of 1,680 (550–8,444) copies/106 cells (sensitivity: 98.5%; accuracy: 98.9). These performances were superior to those reported by the rpoB assay in FFPE subsamples (sensitivity: 66.20%; accuracy: 74.1) and even superior to those reported by Xpert and AFB in fresh subsamples (sensitivity: 79.4 and 33.8%, respectively; accuracy: 84.3 and 49.4, respectively). When Xpert and AFB results were stratified according to mycobacterial load detected by rpoB and IS6110 ddPCR, bacterial load was lower in Xpert and AFB negative with respect to Xpert and AFB-positive samples (p = 0.003 and 0.01 for rpoB and p = 0.01 and 0.11 for IS6110), confirming the poor sensitivity of these methods in paucibacillary disease.Conclusion: ddPCR provides highly sensitive, accurate, and rapid MTB diagnosis in FFPE samples, as defined by the high concordance between IS6110 assay and culture results. This approach can be safely introduced in clinical routine to accelerate MTB diagnosis mainly when culture results remain unavailable.

Highlights

  • Tuberculosis (TB) is a multisystemic disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB)

  • No significant differences in the IS6110 or rpoB loads were found against time of the first MTB diagnosis, anatomical districts, age, or sex of patients (Supplementary Figures 4A–H). Results of this preliminary study clearly revealed that the ddPCRbased assay was non-inferior to the reference culture method for the detection of MTB in tissue biopsies, even when formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples were considered

  • The standard Xpert R MTB/RIF and acid-fast bacilli in smears (AFB) microscopy used for tuberculosis case detection in fresh subsamples, as well as defined by the sensitivities obtained in the 89 in-blind analyzed biopsies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a multisystemic disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB). The pathogen primarily infects the lungs (pulmonary TB) but can affect other structural parts of the human anatomy (extrapulmonary TB), such as lymph nodes, intestines, pleura, skin, and bones (Noussair et al, 2009). It affects approximately 2 billion people worldwide, especially in developing countries, and stands as the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent [World Health Organization (WHO), 2012]. Rapid and reliable diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) represents a diagnostic challenge in compartmentalized extrapulmonary TB infection because of the small number of mycobacteria (MTB) and the frequent lack of fresh samples to perform culture. We estimate the performances of homemade droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)based assays against culture in 89 biopsies, for those fresh and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) subsamples were available

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.