Abstract

Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly used to assess water quality and ecological condition of aquatic ecosystems and they form the basis of several biotic indices. Many of these biotic indices are based on rapid bioassessment protocols (RBP). The first RBP based on macroinvertebrates, developed in Africa in the early 1990s, was the South Africa Scoring System (SASS). Since then SASS has been widely used in southern Africa and beyond, and has formed the basis of several other RBPs developed in Africa. This paper explores the RBPs and associated biotic indices currently used in Africa, primarily those that are rapid, field-based with low taxonomy (mostly family level) and which rely on sensitivity weightings of individual taxa to generate three metrics for interpreting water quality and ecological condition of aquatic ecosystems. Recommendations for future regional adaptation of RBPs, including calibration, validation, and modification of RBPs and biotic indices for new regions are provided. To date, five RBPs have been developed in Africa, while some existing biotic indices have been used outside their intended regional range. Key to the efficacy of any RBP and associated biotic index is the ability to detect a water quality impact, or change in river health. Important considerations when adapting an index for a new region or country include evaluating the suitability of the sampling protocol to local river conditions, evaluating the distribution of aquatic macroinvertebrate taxa in the region, assigning sensitivity weightings to new taxa in the region, evaluating the ability of the biotic index to detect impacts, evaluating within-country spatial and temporal variability in macroinvertebrate assemblages, and developing appropriate data interpretation guidelines based on metric scores and reference conditions. Often several iterations of a biotic index are needed, with improvement in efficacy with each version, following spatially and temporally comprehensive sampling. Future RBPs developed for bioassessment of rivers in Africa will promote the protection, conservation, and management of African riverine ecosystems.

Highlights

  • For all rapid bioassessment protocols (RBP), the associated biotic index generates three metrics, namely Total Score, Number of Taxa and Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT = Total Score divided by Number of Taxa)

  • The aim of this paper is to examine and discuss RBPs and biotic indices currently used in rivers in Africa, in particular those RBPs that are rapid, field-based with low taxonomic resolution and which rely on sensitivity weightings of individual taxa to generate three metrics for interpreting water quality and ecological condition of aquatic ecosystems

  • These protocols are intended for use in SAMPLING IN SMALLER WADEABLE RIVERS (

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly used to assess river water quality and form the basis of several biotic indices including those used in the United Kingdom (e.g., Armitage et al, 1983; Wright et al, 1998), Europe (e.g., Alba-Tercedor and Sánchez-Ortega, 1988; Camargo, 1993; Bonada et al, 2006), North America (e.g., Hilsenhoff, 1988; Rosenberg and Resh, 1993; Barbour et al, 1999), South America (e.g., Baptista et al, 2007; Buss and Vitorino, 2010), Asia (e.g., Morse et al, 2007; Hartmann et al, 2010; Blakely et al, 2014), Australia (e.g., Chessman, 1995, 2003; Smith et al, 1999), New Zealand (e.g., Stark, 1993, 1998; Stark and Maxted, 2007), and Africa (e.g., Chutter, 1972, 1998; Dickens and Graham, 2002; Palmer and Taylor, 2004; Ollis et al, 2006; Dallas, 2009; Kaaya et al, 2015; Dallas et al, 2018). Especially those reliant on rapid, field-based protocols, use family-level taxonomic resolution because it is easier and less expensive (Bonada et al, 2006)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call