Abstract
The absolute granulocyte count (AGC) in 125 blood samples from patients with total white blood cell counts of less than 1,000/microliter was estimated using three different methods, which were then compared for efficiency and accuracy. The three methods were 25 cell differential counts using Wright's-stained blood smears, granulocyte percentage estimates from WBC counting chambers, and combined narrow- and wide-angle light-scatter characteristics determined on a flow cytometer. A survey of clinical laboratories at University Hospital Cancer Centers revealed that the smear differential was the most-often-used method in those laboratories even when less than 25 cells could be counted. Consequently the data obtained from the counting chamber and flow cytometer methods were compared to the smear differential "standard" using linear regression, and outliers were identified. There was good correlation between AGC determined by smear differential and WBC counting chamber (correlation coefficient .911) and excellent correlation between the AGC determined by smear differential and the flow cytometer method (correlation coefficient .970). The flow cytometer method used in this investigation required minimal specimen preparation, and test results were available at a rate of 60 seconds/sample. The ease of sample preparation, speed, and statistical reliability of test results makes the flow cytometer an attractive alternate method of determining granulocyte counts on leukopenic patients as compared to the stained blood smear differential.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.