Abstract
Two methods for detection of influenza virus in 234 clinical respiratory specimens were compared: (i) a 24-well plate-centrifugation assay using Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells and staining with monoclonal antibody pools to influenza A and B (Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA) after incubation for 16 h and 40 h, and (ii) conventional tube cell culture using MDCK cells and primary rhesus monkey kidney cells. Influenza A was identified in 23 specimens (10%). No influenza B was recovered. The rapid centrifugation and tissue culture methods were positive for influenza A in 21 (91%) and 16 (70%) of the 23 specimens, respectively. Fourteen specimens were positive by both methods, 2 were positive by tissue culture alone, and 7 were positive by rapid centrifugation only. Of the 21 specimens positive by rapid centrifugation, 16 (76%) were detected after overnight incubation, and 5 (24%) were positive only after incubation for 40 h. Cytopathic effect was observed in 13 (81%) of the 16 isolates identified by tissue culture after an average of 6 days, and 3 (19%) were identified only by hemadsorption and staining with monoclonal antibodies at day 10. Compared with conventional tissue culture, the 24-well plate centrifugation assay is a more rapid and more sensitive method for detecting influenza virus in clinical specimens.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
