Abstract

Double-differential cross-sections $d^{2}\sigma/d\Omega dE$ for isotopically identified intermediate mass fragments ( 6Li up to 27Mg from nuclear reactions induced by 480 MeV protons impinging on a silver target were analyzed in the frame of a two-step model. The first step of the reaction was described by the intranuclear cascade model INCL4.6 and the second one by four different models (ABLA07,GEM2, GEMINI++, and SMM). The experimental spectra reveal the presence of low-energy, isotropic as well as high-energy, forward-peaked contributions. The INCL4.6 model offers a possibility to describe the latter contribution for light intermediate mass fragments by coalescence of the emitted nucleons. The qualitative agreement of the model predictions with the data was observed but the high-energy tails of the spectra were significantly overestimated. The shape of the isotropic part of the spectra was reproduced by all four models. The GEM2 model strongly underestimated the value of the cross-sections for heavier IMF whereas the SMM and ABLA07 models generally overestimated the data. The best quantitative description of the data was offered by GEMINI++, however, a discrepancy between the data and the model cross-sections still remained for almost all reaction products, especially at forward angles. It indicates that non-equilibrium processes are present which cannot be reproduced by the applied models. The goodness of the data description was judged quantitatively using two statistical deviation factors, the H-factor and the M-factor, as a tool for ranking and validation of the theoretical models.

Highlights

  • The aim of the present work is to investigate the quality of the data reproduction by the INCL4.6 model [13] coupled to four different models describing the second stage of the reaction: ABLA07 [14], GEMINI++ [15, 16], GEM2 [17, 18] and SMM [19,20,21,22] for a silver target which has the mass number intermediate between those of lighter Fe, Ni on the one hand and heavier Au, Pb targets on the other hand

  • As can be seen the sum of ranks is the smallest for GEMINI++. It is about 10%, 25% and 70% larger for SMM, ABLA07 and GEM2, respectively. This result is in agreement with the conclusions which state that the GEMINI++ offers the best description, SMM and ABLA07 give almost the same results, slightly poorer than GEMINI++, and GEM2 description is the worst

  • The first step of the reaction was described by the intranuclear cascade model INCL4.6 [13] and the second step by four models (ABLA07 [14], GEMINI++ [15, 16], GEM2 [17, 18] and SMM [19,20,21,22]) which realize different scenarios of the de-excitation of the equilibrated target remnant

Read more

Summary

THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL A

The Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Lojasiewicza 11, 30-348 Krakow, Poland 2 Institut fuer Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany. Received: 11 February 2016 / Revised: 5 May 2016 Published online: 24 June 2016 c The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Communicated by T.

Introduction
Summary
Standardized M
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call