Abstract

Many blind people rely on echoes from self-produced sounds to assess their environment. It has been shown that human subjects can use echolocation for directional localization and orientation in a room, but echo-acoustic distance perception - e.g. to determine one's position in a room - has received little scientific attention, and systematic studies on the influence of additional early reflections and exploratory head movements are lacking. This study investigates echo-acoustic distance discrimination in virtual echo-acoustic space, using the impulse responses of a real corridor. Six blindfolded sighted subjects and a blind echolocation expert had to discriminate between two positions in the virtual corridor, which differed by their distance to the front wall, but not to the lateral walls. To solve this task, participants evaluated echoes that were generated in real time from self-produced vocalizations. Across experimental conditions, we systematically varied the restrictions for head rotations, the subjects' orientation in virtual space and the reference position. Three key results were observed. First, all participants successfully solved the task with discrimination thresholds below 1 m for all reference distances (0.75–4 m). Performance was best for the smallest reference distance of 0.75 m, with thresholds around 20 cm. Second, distance discrimination performance was relatively robust against additional early reflections, compared to other echolocation tasks like directional localization. Third, free head rotations during echolocation can improve distance discrimination performance in complex environmental settings. However, head movements do not necessarily provide a benefit over static echolocation from an optimal single orientation. These results show that accurate distance discrimination through echolocation is possible over a wide range of reference distances and environmental conditions. This is an important functional benefit of human echolocation, which may also play a major role in the calibration of auditory space representations.

Highlights

  • Bats and toothed whales are known for using the echoes of self-produced sounds to represent their surrounding environment even in complete darkness, which is referred to as echolocation [1, 2]

  • The few studies that have investigated the resolution of echo-acoustic distance perception report somewhat conflicting results: Kellogg [18] found that two blind subjects could discriminate differences of 11 and 18 cm in the distance of two consecutively presented sound reflecting surfaces at a reference distance of 61 cm, whereas his blindfolded sighted subjects performed at chance level

  • Performance declined with increasing reference distance. This effect was reinforced in close proximity of a lateral wall, i.e. a close-by lateral wall induced a relative improvement in performance for the minimum reference distance and a relative decline in performance for the maximum reference distance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bats and toothed whales are known for using the echoes of self-produced sounds to represent their surrounding environment even in complete darkness, which is referred to as echolocation [1, 2]. While there is comprehensive evidence that both blind and sighted humans can use echolocation to detect a sound reflecting surface [12, 13, 14] and to determine its azimuthal direction with high acuity [5, 7, 8, 12, 15, 16, 17], echo-acoustic distance perception has received relatively little scientific attention. The few studies that have investigated the resolution of echo-acoustic distance perception report somewhat conflicting results: Kellogg [18] found that two blind subjects could discriminate differences of 11 and 18 cm in the distance of two consecutively presented sound reflecting surfaces at a reference distance of 61 cm, whereas his blindfolded sighted subjects performed at chance level. Kellogg [18] reported above chance performance only for blind subjects with close-by reflectors (around 0.6 m distance), whereas Schornich et al [6] investigated performance of sighted subjects with reflectors for distances above 1.7 m, only

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call