Range of Movement and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Elderly: A Comparison of Anatomical Versus Reverse Shoulder Replacements.

Abstract

IntroductionShoulder arthroplasty is in increasing demand in the elderly given the rising prevalence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) across the population. There is a dearth of evidence in the current literature comparing anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in the elderly population. This study compares patient-reported outcome measures and range of movement (ROM) between anatomical and reverse total shoulder replacements in matched patient cohorts over the age of 70 years.Materials and methodsThis retrospective cohort study compares range of movement and patient-reported outcomes between anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in matched cohorts over the age of 70 years at a single institution between 2011 and 2015. Overall, 75 patients were recruited, including 44 patients with anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and 31 patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Cohorts were matched according to age, preoperative Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and preoperative range of movement. The minimum clinical follow-up was one year.ResultsAt one year, range of movement metrics in flexion, abduction, and external rotation all demonstrated greater improvements in the anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty cohort in comparison to the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty cohort (p<0.0001). No statistical difference in Oxford Shoulder Score was evident between cohorts.ConclusionAnatomical total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrates a significant improvement in range of movement in comparison to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in matched elderly patient cohorts. However, there was no statistical difference in functional assessment scores between reverse shoulder replacement and anatomical shoulder replacement.