Randomized trial of parathyroidectomy in mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: Patient description and effects on the SF-36 health survey

Abstract

Background. The treatment of patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism remains controversial despite a National Institutes of Health consensus statement. This statement also recommended a randomized clinical trial because none exists to address this issue. Methods. Informed consent was obtained from 53 asymptomatic patients with confirmed asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism who participated in this randomized trial of parathyroidectomy versus observation. Patients completed the SF-36 Health Survey, an instrument that measures wellness, every 6 months for 2 years. Average annual changes were compared. Results. Fifty-three patients (42 female, 11 male) with asymptomatic, mild (serum calcium level, 10.1-11.5 mg/dL) asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism who agreed to participate were randomized into either a surgical group or an observation group. The mean calcium level was 10.31 mg/dL. The only demographic difference between groups was age, with the operative group being older (66.7 vs 62.6 years; P <.03). The scores on 2 of the 9 domains of the SF-36 were significantly different (P <.007 and <.012, respectively); both favored the operative group. Conclusions. Improved function is seen after parathyroidectomy when compared with patients who did not undergo operation. This study supports surgical management of mild primary hyperparathyroidism at the time of diagnosis because many patients have reversible nonclassic symptoms of the disease. (Surgery 2000;128:1013-21.)