Randomized study of high-dose versus low-dose methotrexate in the treatment of extensive small cell lung cancer

Abstract

Forty patients with extensive small cell lung cancer randomly received either high-dose or low-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue in combination with cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine alternating with cycles of VP-16, vincristine, and hexamethylmelamine. Nineteen patients were treated with the high-dose methotrexate regimen, and 21 received the low-dose methotrexate treatment protocol; both treatment groups were similar in median age, performance status and spread of disease. Response rates (74 percent for high-dose therapy; 67 percent for low-dose therapy), median survival (nine months versus nine months), and overall survival were similar for the two treatment groups. Myelo-suppression was equivalent in both treatment groups but moderate to severe mucositis developed more often when patients were treated with the high-dose methotrexate regimen as compared with low-dose methotrexate therapy (p < 0.001). Central nervous system recurrences developed after three patients received high-dose methotrexate therapy. This study indicates that when used with other antineoplastic agents, high-dose methotrexate therapy does not improve the remission rate or survival nor does it decrease central nervous system metastasis in patients with small cell lung cancer when compared with standard doses of methotrexate; high-dose methotrexate is associated with greater cost and toxicity.