Randomized phase III clinical study comparing postoperative UFT/LV,UFT+LV/UFT and UFT+LV+PSK/UFT+PSK as adjuvant therapy for curatively resected stage III colorectal cancer HGCSG-CAD study.

Abstract

3638 Background: Study showed that the oral anticancer agent UFT/LV is useful as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer. PSK, a protein-bound polysaccharide extracted from the mycelia of Coriolus versicolor, is an immunomodulator widely used in gastric, colorectal and lung cancers. Methods: Patients aged 20-80 years with stage III colorectal cancer registered in 35 facilities were randomized to: group A (UFT/LV 28 days/5 weeks for 6 months); group B (UFT+LV 28 days/5 weeks for 6 months, then UFT for 12 months); and group C (UFT+LV+PSK 28 days/5 weeks for 6 months, then UFT+PSK for 12 months). Treatment was started within 6 months after curative resection. Outcome measures were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), incidence and severity of adverse events, and QOL. Results: Of 342 patients registered, 340 eligible patients were analyzed (84 in group A, 85 in group B, and 171 in group C). At baseline, variation in QOL score was observed but histopathological parameters were not different among 3 groups. Median observation period was 36 months. 3-year RFS was 73.8%, 77.6% and 73.9% in groups A, B, and C [A vs C: hazard ratio (HR) 0.960, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.575-1.601; B vs C: HR 0.837, CI 0.488-1.433; A vs B: HR 1.151, CI 0.623-2.126]. 3-year OS was 95.2%, 91.8% and 89.9% in groups A, B, and C (A vs C: HR 0.460, CI 0.155-1.367; B vs C: HR 0.814, CI 0.338-1.963 A vs B: HR 0.570, CI 0.167-1.947). Adverse events ≥grade 3 included gastrointestinal symptoms and general status. There was no treatment-related death. Excluding high fatigue score in QOL scale that showed pretreatment variation, stratification analysis showed interaction between family score and group, and efficacy was suggested especially in group C with high score (3-yesr RFS: 66.7%, 68.2% and 88.1% in groups A, B, and C. A vs C: HR 3.289, CI 0.951-11.375, B vs C: HR 3.070, CI 0.973-9.685, A vs B: HR 1.084, CI 0.344-3.417). Conclusions: A significant difference in primary endpoint was not detected. Variation in QOL at treatment initiation probably greatly affected outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT00209742.