Randomized phase II trial of concomitant CT/RT versus TPF followed by concomitant CT/RT in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN)

Abstract

5518 Background: Concomitant CT/RT is the standard treatment for LASCCHN. Induction chemotherapy followed by CT/RT vs CT/RT alone have not yet been compared. The feasibility of TPF followed by CT/RT has been evaluated in a previous study (Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 59:481). Methods: Pts with inoperable stage III-IVa, PS 0–1, were randomized to CT/RT [2 cycles of Cisplatin 20 mg/sqm days 1–4, 5FU 800 mg/sqm 96 hours c.i. weeks 1 and 6 during RT (66–70 Gy)] (Arm A) or 3 cycles of neoadjuvant TPF (Docetaxel 75mg/sqm day1, Cisplatin 80mg/sqm day1, 5FU 800mg/sqm 96 hours c.i) followed by the same CT/RT (Arm B). Pts were stratified according to tumor site, T stage and nodal status. Neck dissection was performed in N2-N3 patients with pathological CR on primary tumor. The planned sample size was 96 pts to detect a difference in CR (primary endpoint) up to 15% in favour of arm B. The radiological responses were evaluated by an internal committee according to RECIST criteria. Results: Preliminary data are available for 84/96 randomized pts (42 arm A, 42 arm B). Pts/tumor characteristics are well balanced in the two arms. Toxicities during induction TPF consisted primarily of G3–4 granulocytopenia 56% (febrile neutropenia: 7.5%). Grade 3–4 toxicities during CT/RT in arm A and B were mucositis (42% and 26%), dysphagia (20% and 9%), skin reaction (12% and 8.6%), asthenia (5% and 3%); G3 weight loss (2% and 3%), G3 dry-mouth (0% and 3%). Duration of CT/RT was equivalent: 6.1 wks (4.2–8.7) in arm A and 6.3 wks (3.8–9.5) in arm B. At the end of CT/RT, in the 82 pts evaluable for efficacy, radiological CR were 20% (95% CI 8–37%) in arm A and 64% (95% CI 45–80%) in arm B. Conclusions: Three cycles of neoadjuvant TPF are feasible and don’t compromise subsequent concomitant CT/RT with comparable toxicity pattern. At the end of the treatment sequence serious adverse events were 31% in arm A and 34% in arm B. The difference in CR of 40% in favour of arm B justifies the following phase III study. Final results including pCR and DFS will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]