Abstract

Determine the efficacy and side effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat refractory neocortical epilepsy and study differences in effect between a figure-8 and round coil type. This single-center randomized sham-controlled crossover trial (NCT01745952 on ClinicalTrials.gov) included 11 patients with well-defined focal epilepsy. rTMS (0.5 Hz) was targeted to the focus during three treatment conditions consisting of 1,500 stimulations/day for 10 weekdays at 90% of resting motor threshold (rMT) followed by a 10-week observation period. Patients were randomized for the order in which the figure-8, round, and sham coil were used. Outcome assessors and patients were blinded to the type of coil used. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of seizure reduction after active rTMS treatment. Other outcome measures were responder rate, quality of life, and side effects. There was no difference between a figure-8 and round coil. None of the patients achieved an overall 50% seizure reduction. One patient responded during 1 month after treatment with either active coil, followed by a significant increase in seizure frequency. Another patient had a fourfold increase in seizure frequency during rTMS treatment. This study provides evidence that rTMS is on average not effective for reducing seizure frequency. No difference in effectiveness between the different coil types was observed. It can, however, exacerbate seizures during treatment and lead to a rebound in seizure frequency after an initial reduction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.