Abstract

A priori registration of randomized clinical trials is crucial to the transparency and credibility of their findings. Aim of this study was to assess the frequency with which registered and completed randomized trials in orthodontics are published. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN for registered randomized clinical trials in orthodontics that had been completed up to January 2017 and judged the publication status and date of registered trials using a systematic protocol. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher exact tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. From the 266 orthodontic trials registered up to January 2017, 80 trials had been completed and included in the present study. Among these 80 included trials, the majority (76%) were registered retrospectively, while only 33 (41%) were published at the time. The median time from completion to publication was 20.1 months (interquartile range: 9.1 to 31.6 months), while survival analysis indicated that less than 10% of the trials were published after 5 years from their completion. Finally, 22 (28%) of completed trials remain unpublished even after 5 years from their completion. Publication rates of registered randomized trials in orthodontics remained low, even 5 years after their completion date.

Highlights

  • Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard in comparative effectiveness research, due to their explicit methods, internal validity, and transparency

  • We identified a total of 266 registered trials in orthodontic, 130 of which were completed in January 2017, and were assessed for eligibility in the present study (Fig 1; Table B in S1 File)

  • A total of 50 registered trials were judged as ineligible, leaving 80 registered trials that were included in this study. These pertained to 80 randomized trials, the majority (59%) of which originated from Europe and from the United Kingdom (44%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard in comparative effectiveness research, due to their explicit methods, internal validity, and transparency. Crucial to this transparency is the provision of an a priori designed protocol that delineates each trial aspect. Registration and publication of trials in orthodontics and trial overlaps among papers included within systematic reviews [1,2,3,4]. Such a priori registered trial protocols can be either published as standalone publications [5] and/or be registered in freely accessible online repositories [6]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call