Randomised crossover study on pulse oximeter readings from different sensors in very preterm infants.

Abstract

In extremely preterm infants, different target ranges for pulse oximeter saturation (SpO2) may affect mortality and morbidity. Thus, the impact of technical changes potentially affecting measurements should be assessed. We studied SpO2 readings from different sensors for systematic deviations. Single-centre, randomised, triple crossover study. Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. 24 infants, born at <32 weeks' gestation, with current weight <1500 g and without right-to-left shunt via a patent ductus arteriosus. Simultaneous readings from three SpO2 sensors (Red Diamond (RD), Photoplethysmography (PPG), Low Noise Cabled Sensors (LNCS)) were logged at 0.5 Hz over 6 hour/infant and compared with LNCS as control using analysis of variance. Sensor position was randomly allocated and rotated every 2 hours. Seven different batches each were used. Primary outcome was the difference in SpO2 readings. Secondary outcomes were differences between sensors in the proportion of time within the SpO2-target range (90-95 (100)%). Mean gestational age at birth (±SD) was 274/7 (±23/7) weeks, postnatal age 20 (±20) days. 134 hours of recording were analysed. Mean SpO2 (±SD) was 94.0% (±3.8; LNCS) versus 92.2% (±4.0; RD; p<0.0001) and 94.5% (±3.9; PPG; p<0.0001), respectively. Mean SpO2 difference (95% CI) was -1.8% (-1.9 to -1.8; RD) and 0.5% (0.4 to 0.5; PPG). Proportion of time in target was significantly lower with RD sensors (84.8% vs 91.7%; p=0.0001) and similar with PPG sensors (91.1% vs 91.7%; p=0.63). There were systematic differences in SpO2 readings between RD sensors versus LNCS. These findings may impact mortality and morbidity of preterm infants, particularly when aiming for higher SpO2-target ranges (eg, 90-95%). DRKS00027285.