Abstract

(1) Background: Surgical site skin preparation is an important approach to prevent postoperative wound infections. International guidelines recommend that alcohol-based combinations be used, however, the optimal combination remains uncertain. This study compares the effectiveness of alcohol-based chlorhexidine and alcohol-based iodophor for surgical site skin preparation for prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs). (2) Methods: Randomised controlled trials comparing alcohol-based interventions for surgical site skin preparation were included. The proportion of SSIs was compared using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The meta-analysis was performed with a fixed effect model using Mantel-Haenszel methods. As an a priori subgroup analysis SSI risk was examined according to different surgical procedural groups. (3) Results: Thirteen studies were included (n = 6023 participants). The use of chlorhexidine-alcohol was associated with a reduction in risk of SSIs compared with iodophor-alcohol (RR 0.790; 95% CI 0.669, 0.932). On sub-group analysis, chlorhexidine-alcohol was associated with a reduction in SSIs in caesarean surgery (RR 0.614; 95% CI 0.453, 0.831) however, chlorhexidine-alcohol was associated with an increased risk of SSI in bone and joint surgery (RR 2.667; 95% CI 1.051, 6.765). When excluding studies at high risk of bias on sensitivity analysis, this difference in alcohol-based combinations for bone and joint surgery was no longer observed (RR 2.636; 95% CI 0.995, 6.983). (4) Conclusions: The use of chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparations was associated with a reduced risk of SSI compared to iodophor-alcohol agents. However, the efficacy of alcohol-based preparation agents may differ according to the surgical procedure group. This difference must be interpreted with caution given the low number of studies and potential for bias, however, it warrants further investigation into the potential biological and clinical validity of these findings.

Highlights

  • Over 300 million surgeries are performed annually worldwide based on a 2012 estimate [1]

  • It is recommended that alcohol-based products, combining chlorhexidine with alcohol or iodophors with alcohol, be used in preference to aqueous-based products, based on improved efficacy demonstrated in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses [6,7,8,9]

  • Wound infection defined as any wound abnormality at time of participant’s discharge as agreed by two observers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over 300 million surgeries are performed annually worldwide based on a 2012 estimate [1]. Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a major, costly complication of surgical procedures [2,3,4]. The patient’s skin bacteria is the major source of infecting pathogens involved in SSIs and is the target of infection prevention strategies such as surgical site skin preparation [5,6,7,8]. The three main agents used are chlorhexidine gluconate, iodophors or alcohol. The optimal preparation remains an issue of controversy [9]. It is recommended that alcohol-based products, combining chlorhexidine with alcohol or iodophors with alcohol, be used in preference to aqueous-based products, based on improved efficacy demonstrated in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses [6,7,8,9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.