Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) following first line sorafenib: Pooled efficacy and safety in Chinese patients across two global randomized phase 3 studies (REACH-2 and REACH).

Abstract

e16081 Background: REACH-2 and REACH were two global, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PL)-controlled phase 3 studies of Ramucirumab (RAM) versus PL in patients with HCC after prior sorafenib. REACH-2 confirmed the RAM treatment benefit for patients with baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, consistent with results in a prespecified subgroup of patients in REACH with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. A pooled analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAM in Chinese patients (including patients from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan) from REACH-2 and REACH with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL. Methods: Except for AFP level requirement, REACH-2 and REACH were similar in study design and included patients who had advanced HCC (BCLC stage C or B disease refractory or not amenable to locoregional therapy), Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0-1, and prior sorafenib. Patients were randomized to RAM (8 mg/kg) I.V. or PL Q2W, plus best supportive care, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Individual patient data were pooled from REACH-2 and REACH (AFP ≥400 mg/mL). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were reported. Efficacy analyses were stratified by study to account for any potential difference in the two studies. Results: Data from 155 Chinese patients were pooled from REACH (51) and REACH-2 (104) (N = 98 RAM vs N = 57 PL). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms in pooled data set; however, lower median level of AFP was noted in the RAM arm. In the pooled population, RAM treatment numerically improved OS over PL (median OS 7.1 months vs 4.7 months; HR = 0.735 [95% CI: 0.512, 1.055]). Improvements in PFS (median PFS 2.6 months vs 1.5 months; HR = 0.666 [95% CI: 0.459, 0.967]), ORR (3.1% vs 0%), and DCR (44.9% vs 29.8%) were also observed. Hypertension (6.1% vs 1.8%), pneumonia (5.1% vs 1.8%), and hyponatremia (5.1% vs 1.8%) were the Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among ≥ 5% patients that was more frequently observed in the RAM arm compared with the PL arm. Conclusions: Pooled analysis of two phase 3 trials of RAM as second-line treatment in patients with HCC following sorafenib demonstrated a clinically meaningful benefit with a manageable safety profile in Chinese HCC patients with baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. Treatment benefits in OS observed in the pooled Chinese population were consistent with the entire population from REACH/REACH-2 (AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL). Clinical trial information: NCT01140347, NCT02435433.