Abstract

Large, high-severity wildfires, or “megafires,” occur periodically in arid Australian spinifex (Triodia spp.) grasslands after high rainfall periods that trigger fuel accumulation. Proponents of the patch-burn mosaic (PBM) hypothesis suggest that these fires are unprecedented in the modern era and were formerly constrained by Aboriginal patch burning that kept landscape fuel levels low. This assumption deserves scrutiny, as evidence from fire-prone systems globally indicates that weather factors are the primary determinant behind megafire incidence, and that fuel management does not mitigate such fires during periods of climatic extreme. We reviewed explorer’s diaries, anthropologist’s reports, and remotely sensed data from the Australian Western Desert for evidence of large rainfall-linked fires during the pre-contact period when traditional Aboriginal patch burning was still being practiced. We used only observations that contained empiric estimates of fire sizes. Concurrently, we employed remote rainfall data and the Oceanic Niño Index to relate fire size to likely seasonal conditions at the time the observations were made. Numerous records were found of small fires during periods of average and below-average rainfall conditions, but no evidence of large-scale fires during these times. By contrast, there was strong evidence of large-scale wildfires during a high-rainfall period in the early 1870s, some of which are estimated to have burnt areas up to 700,000 ha. Our literature review also identified several Western Desert Aboriginal mythologies that refer to large-scale conflagrations. As oral traditions sometimes corroborate historic events, these myths may add further evidence that large fires are an inherent feature of spinifex grassland fire regimes. Overall, the results suggest that, contrary to predictions of the PBM hypothesis, traditional Aboriginal burning did not modulate spinifex fire size during periods of extreme-high arid zone rainfall. The mechanism behind this is that plant assemblages in seral spinifex vegetation comprise highly flammable non-spinifex tussock grasses that rapidly accumulate high fuel loads under favorable precipitation conditions. Our finding that fuel management does not prevent megafires under extreme conditions in arid Australia has parallels with the primacy of climatic factors as drivers of megafires in the forests of temperate Australia.

Highlights

  • Large-scale high-intensity conflagrations occur during periods of meteorological extreme in many fire-prone ecosystems (Keeley and Fotheringham, 2001; Gill and Allan, 2008; Bradstock, 2010)

  • As part of our review of pre-contact Western Desert fires, we examined fire scars on Landsat satellite imagery taken during the 1970s in the Lake Mackay region of Western Australia

  • Warburton in 1873, Giles in 1873 and 1874, and the 1970s Lake Mackay mapping of this study are examples of massive rainfall-linked fires during the preEuropean period when traditional Aboriginal patch burning was still being practiced. The size of these fires is similar in scale to larger arid Australian wildfires recorded following high-rainfall periods in the contemporary era (Griffin et al, 1983; Allan and Southgate, 2002; Allan et al, 2003; Verhoeven et al, 2020) and dwarfs modern fires observed during periods of average or below-average rainfall (Turner et al, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large-scale high-intensity conflagrations occur during periods of meteorological extreme in many fire-prone ecosystems (Keeley and Fotheringham, 2001; Gill and Allan, 2008; Bradstock, 2010). Modeling has shown that these fuels carry fire well, even under relatively low wind situations, and are unlikely to act to as fire-retardant breaks under any fire weather (Moritz et al, 2004; Keeley and Zedler, 2009). In these systems, fire occurrence is driven more by extremes of meteorological variables such as temperature, humidity, and wind speed, rather than timesince-fire and associated characteristics of the fuel array (Keeley and Fotheringham, 2001)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.