Abstract
The effect of tree spacing on rainfall interception loss has been investigated in stands of Sitka spruce ( Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr) spaced at intervals of 2, 4, 6 and 8 m. The traditional volume balance method was used to measure throughfall, stemflow and interception loss. The variation of throughfall, stemflow and interception loss between the four spacing treatments is analysed. The results obtained showed that, on average, annual intercepton loss as a percentage of gross rainfall was 33, 24, 15 and 9% in the 2, 4, 6 and 8 m spacing treatments, respectively. An estimate of average boundary layer conductance was made by equating interception loss with evaporation rate and inverting a truncated form of the Penman equation. The boundary layer conductance per tree increased with spacing from 0.58 m 3 s −1 in the 2 m spacing treatment to 4.24 m 3 s −1 in the 8 m spacing treatment, whereas boundary layer conductance per unit area declined from 0.17 to 0.07 m s −1 as the density of trees decreased. The difference in interception loss between the spacing treatments was attributed to the difference in the boundary layer conductance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
