Abstract

Railways are a major source of direct mortality for many populations of large mammals, but they have been less studied or mitigated than roads. We evaluated temporal and spatial factors affecting mortality risk using 646 railway mortality incidents for 11 mammal species collected over 24 years throughout Banff and Yoho National Parks, Canada. We divided species into three guilds (bears, other carnivores, and ungulates), compared site attributes of topography, land cover, and train operation between mortality and paired random locations at four spatial scales, and described temporal patterns or mortality. Mortality risk increased across multiple guilds and spatial scales with maximum train speed and higher track curvature, both suggesting problems with train detection, and in areas with high proximity to and amount of water, both suggesting limitations to animal movement. Mortality risk was also correlated, but more varied among guilds and spatial scales, with shrub cover, topographic complexity, and proximity to sidings and roads. Seasonally, mortality rates were highest in winter for ungulates and other carnivores, and in late spring for bears, respectively. Our results suggest that effective mitigation could address train speed or detectability by wildlife, especially at sites with high track curvature that are near water or attractive habitat.

Highlights

  • Railways are a major source of direct mortality for many populations of large mammals, but they have been less studied or mitigated than roads

  • The direction of parameter effects was consistent among spatial scales, but it sometimes differed among guilds (Fig. 2)

  • We sought to advance this information by evaluating predictor variables at several spatial scales across three guilds of large mammals, bears, other carnivores, and ungulates, killed on the railway in two mountain protected areas of Canada

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Railways are a major source of direct mortality for many populations of large mammals, but they have been less studied or mitigated than roads. Collisions with wildlife on railways are less likely to injure people, or be witnessed by them, reducing societal demand for expensive mitigation These factors increase the logic of site-specific mitigations in areas of heightened mortality rates or risk to populations of conservation or cultural concern. Such hotspots of collisions have been studied extensively on ­roads[33], but similar comparative study for railways is still relatively r­ are[34,35]. There is not yet a general understanding of the spatial and temporal factors that increase mortality risk for wildlife on railways and how those factors vary among taxa

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call