RADT-39. CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM BRIDGING RADIOTHERAPY (CNS-BRT) ACHIEVES RAPID CYTOREDUCTION PRIOR TO CAR T-CELL THERAPY FOR AGGRESSIVE B-CELL LYMPHOMAS

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Abstract BACKGROUND CAR T-cell therapy (CART) for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a promising strategy, yet responses are frequently not durable. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) is used for extra-cranial lymphoma to improve CART outcomes through cytoreduction of high-risk lesions. We hypothesized that CNS-BRT would achieve similar, significant cytoreduction prior to CART for CNSL. METHODS We analyzed CNSL patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas who received CNS-BRT prior to commercial CART. Best CNS response post-CART was evaluated using the International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG) or RANO for parenchymal or leptomeningeal lesions, respectively. Cytoreduction from CNS-BRT was calculated as change in lesion size prior to CART. RESULTS Twelve patients received CNS-BRT, with median follow up of 11.8m (IQR: 8.5–21.9). Ten had CNSL (9 secondary, 1 primary) and 2 patients had epidural disease (evaluable for toxicity). All ten CNSL patients had progressive disease at the time of CNS-BRT. RT targets included whole brain (n=3), involved site (partial) brain (n=4), involved site spine (n=4), and orbits (n=1) with median dose 24Gy (range: 15-33). 1/12 patients experienced grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and 3/12 patients experienced grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). CNS-BRT achieved a 74.0% (95%CI: 62.0–86.0) mean reduction in lesion size from baseline (p=0.014) at a median of only 12d from BRT completion and pre-CART infusion. Best CNS response included 8 complete responses (CR), 1 partial response (PR), and 1 progressive disease (PD). Three patients experienced CNS relapse outside the BRT field for a 12-month estimated risk of CNS progression post-CART of 20.0% (95%CI: 3–49). CONCLUSIONS Early data suggest CNS-BRT achieves rapid cytoreduction and favorable CNS response. The rates of severe CRS/ICANS were similar to comparison series of CNSL patients treated with CART without BRT suggesting an acceptable safety profile. Our data support further study of BRT as a bridging strategy for CNSL-directed CART.