Abstract

ObjectiveAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) is beneficial for unfavorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer patients receiving curative radiotherapy (RT). However, for favorable IR patients the latest NCCN guidelines recommends RT alone. We retrospectively studied treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with IR prostate cancer in our institution over the past two decades.Materials and methodsThree hundred seventy-three IR prostate cancer patients treated with definitive RT between 5/2002–5/2016 were identified in an institutional review board approved database. All patients received conformal RT to the prostate while the vast majority did not receive nodal radiation. ADT was commenced 2 months prior to RT and was continued for 4 months after RT.ResultsCompared to RT alone, patients receiving combined RT+ ADT had more positive biopsy cores, higher pre-radiation PSA, more IR factors, and were more likely to receive pelvic lymph node radiation. However, there were no differences in failure either biochemical, local or distal, nor on survival between the favorable RT alone and the unfavorable RT+ ADT cohorts, suggesting a beneficial role for ADT. On multivariate analysis, patients 70 years or younger receiving RT alone were at increased risk for biochemical failure during a 6-year follow-up (HR 3.06, P = 0.025). Biochemical relapse free survival in patients ≤70 years who received RT alone was 82.1% vs 94.0% for RT + ADT (P = 0.030). There was no difference for combined treatment modality in patients > 70 years (P = 0.87).ConclusionsMen 70 years or younger with favorable IR prostate cancer treated with RT alone to 78 Gy are at increased risk of biochemical failure. Short term ADT should be considered in this cohort of men.

Highlights

  • Of the three D’Amico risk stratification groups, intermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer is the most heterogeneous and, poses a considerable treatment challenge

  • Men 70 years or younger with favorable IR prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone to 78 Gy are at increased risk of biochemical failure

  • Short term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) should be considered in this cohort of men

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Of the three D’Amico risk stratification groups, intermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer is the most heterogeneous and, poses a considerable treatment challenge. The current recommendations are based on several randomized controlled clinical trials which included mostly high-risk (HR) patients and tested the potential benefit of adding androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to conventional radiation therapy (RT) dose, compared with RT alone. The use of ADT in combination with RT in the IR group has been understudied. D’Amico et al performed a randomized control trial including 206 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who were randomized to receive 70 Gy alone or in combination with 6 months of ADT. The addition of short-term ADT improved survival, the trial was tainted by the inclusion of HR patients: 5% had a Gleason score of 8–10 and 19.4% had Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA) 20–40 ng/mL [4].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call