Abstract

The traditional approaches to safety in risk activities have been applied to radiotherapy following the occurrence of serious accidents. This strategy is based on the characterization of specific risks and the definition of preventive and protective measures, particularly for the implementation of safety barriers. Evaluating the performance of safety barriers makes it possible, in theory, to determine the level of risk control. This article presents a literature review that highlights the limits of the safety barrier concept. To overcome these limitations, we then introduce the notion of “activities contributing to safety” (ACS). This concept allows us to better take into account the managerial, contextual, organizational and human dimensions of safety and to promote risk control through a more realistic approach.

Highlights

  • Radiation therapy is one of three major methods of treating cancer along with surgery and chemotherapy

  • We propose replacing the concept of safety barrier with that of an activity contributing to the safety of care (ACS)

  • One perspective of this research would be to further identify ambiguities and inconsistencies in the concept of safety barriers, including the distinction made between different types of controls, between a barrier and the preconditions necessary for its performance and/or the distinction made between accident prevention and recovery barriers and/or between safety barriers and control systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radiation therapy is one of three major methods of treating cancer along with surgery and chemotherapy. The second level is that of the specific methods used to analyse the risks of accidents and to define provisions to reduce their occurrence or the severity of their consequences These methods aim to characterise the risks and to define and implement successive and complementary countermeasures (equipment, operating limits, control and monitoring, etc.), often referred to as “safety barriers”. Since the occurrence of serious accidents in radiation therapy in France, this concept of safety barrier is used to evaluate the technical and human provisions defined to make. This care process safe (Meyrieux et al, 2012; François et al, 2010; Pernet 2013; Reitz, 2014; Brusadin et al, 2017; Thellier, 2017). These results make it possible in the discussion to propose the concept of an activity contributing to safety in order to cope with the limits of the concept of safety barriers

Different definitions of the concept of safety barrier
Performance of a human safety barrier
Classification difficulties
Difficulties in defining safety barriers
Difficulties in assessing the performance of safety barriers
Safety barrier and technological change
Image preparation and acquisition step
Stage of identifying offsets
Offset reduction step
Discussion: activities that do not only contribute to safety
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call