Abstract
THERE HAVE BEEN discussions in the literature on what is the appropriate length of time to wait between administration of a radiopharmaceutical and scanning of the brain in order best to portray an arteriovenous malformation. It is generally conceded that there is a higher frequency of detection with early scanning because it is primarily the blood pool that is being visualized and not radioactive material diffusing across a disrupted bloodbrain barrier (1–4). The appearance of the arteriovenous malformation on the scan, however, is not definitive and may simulate a neoplasm, infarct, intracerebral hematoma, or other less common causes of positive results. It has been our experience that a characteristically high concentration of radioactivity can be observed passing through the malformation when serial five-second-exposure scintiphotos are taken with the gamma-ray scintillation camera immediately after an intravenous injection of radiopertechnetate (5). The concentration observed in the malformation with...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.