Radiomics-based hybrid model for predicting radiation pneumonitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

PurposeThis study reviewed and meta-analyzed evidence on radiomics-based hybrid models for predicting radiation pneumonitis (RP). These models are crucial for improving thoracic radiotherapy plans and mitigating RP, a common complication of thoracic radiotherapy. We examined and compared the RP prediction models developed in these studies with the radiomics features employed in RP models. MethodsWe systematically searched Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE for studies published up to April 19, 2024. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. We compared the RP prediction models developed in these studies and the radiomics features employed. ResultsRadiomics, as a single-factor evaluation, achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.73, accuracy of 0.69, sensitivity of 0.64, and specificity of 0.74. Dosiomics achieved an AUROC of 0.70. Clinical and dosimetric factors showed lower performance, with AUROCs of 0.59 and 0.58. Combining clinical and radiomic factors yielded an AUROC of 0.78, while combining dosiomic and radiomics factors produced an AUROC of 0.81. Triple combinations, including clinical, dosimetric, and radiomics factors, achieved an AUROC of 0.81. The study identifies key radiomics features, such as the Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and Gray Level Size Zone Matrix (GLSZM), which enhance the predictive accuracy of RP models. ConclusionsRadiomics-based hybrid models are highly effective in predicting RP. These models, combining traditional predictive factors with radiomic features, particularly GLCM and GLSZM, offer a clinically feasible approach for identifying patients at higher RP risk. This approach enhances clinical outcomes and improves patient quality of life. Protocol RegistrationThe protocol of this study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023426565).