Abstract

The aim of the study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of textural features extracted by dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images, by carrying out univariate and multivariate statistical analyses including artificial intelligence approaches. In total, 80 patients with known breast lesion were enrolled in this prospective study according to regulations issued by the local Institutional Review Board. All patients underwent dual-energy CEM examination in both craniocaudally (CC) and double acquisition of mediolateral oblique (MLO) projections (early and late). The reference standard was pathology from a surgical specimen for malignant lesions and pathology from a surgical specimen or fine needle aspiration cytology, core or Tru-Cut needle biopsy, and vacuum assisted breast biopsy for benign lesions. In total, 104 samples of 80 patients were analyzed. Furthermore, 48 textural parameters were extracted by manually segmenting regions of interest. Univariate and multivariate approaches were performed: non-parametric Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test; receiver operating characteristic (ROC), linear classifier (LDA), decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network (NNET), and support vector machine (SVM) were utilized. A balancing approach and feature selection methods were used. The univariate analysis showed low accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for all considered features. Instead, in the multivariate textural analysis, the best performance considering the CC view (accuracy (ACC) = 0.75; AUC = 0.82) was reached with a DT trained with leave-one-out cross-variation (LOOCV) and balanced data (with adaptive synthetic (ADASYN) function) and a subset of three robust textural features (MAD, VARIANCE, and LRLGE). The best performance (ACC = 0.77; AUC = 0.83) considering the early-MLO view was reached with a NNET trained with LOOCV and balanced data (with ADASYN function) and a subset of ten robust features (MEAN, MAD, RANGE, IQR, VARIANCE, CORRELATION, RLV, COARSNESS, BUSYNESS, and STRENGTH). The best performance (ACC = 0.73; AUC = 0.82) considering the late-MLO view was reached with a NNET trained with LOOCV and balanced data (with ADASYN function) and a subset of eleven robust features (MODE, MEDIAN, RANGE, RLN, LRLGE, RLV, LZLGE, GLV_GLSZM, ZSV, COARSNESS, and BUSYNESS). Multivariate analyses using pattern recognition approaches, considering 144 textural features extracted from all three mammographic projections (CC, early MLO, and late MLO), optimized by adaptive synthetic sampling and feature selection operations obtained the best results (ACC = 0.87; AUC = 0.90) and showed the best performance in the discrimination of benign and malignant lesions.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is the most common female disease in the word, diagnosed primarily in over-fifties women [1,2,3].Mammography (MX), introduced in the 1960s, plays a pivotal role in cancer screening, detection, and follow-up, despite the availability of various other breast imaging modalities, such as ultrasound (US) and breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), due to its properties and qualities [4,5].Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a diagnostic technique that combines the advantages of standard full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with the intravenous administration of an iodinated contrast medium, highlighting neovascularity associated with actively growing malignancy

  • The best result (ACC = 0.87; SENS = 0.86; SPEC = 0.87; positive predictive value (PPV) = 0.88; negative predictive value (NPV) = 0.86; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90), were obtained considering 144 textural features extracted from all three mammographic projections (CC, early mediolateral oblique (MLO), and late MLO) at the same time with an support vector machine (SVM)

  • Studies of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) focused on imaging analysis with an auxiliary system for reporting, and on radiomics features features for for benignant benignant and and malignant malignant differentiation differentiation[60,61]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common female disease in the word, diagnosed primarily in over-fifties women [1,2,3]. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a diagnostic technique that combines the advantages of standard full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with the intravenous administration of an iodinated contrast medium, highlighting neovascularity associated with actively growing malignancy. The use of contrast agents in cancer detection is based on the phenomenon that neoplasms induce angiogenesis for further tumor growth. Contrast medium can pass through the walls of new rapidly formed vessels into the (tumor) interstitium, causing enhancement. Dual-energy CEM is a quick and well-tolerated examination that eliminates breast density as a limiting factor when interpreting two-dimensional (2D) mammograms by utilizing a dual-energy acquisition system, which generates a subtracted image to outline areas of enhancement

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call