Abstract
The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-based radiomics features in evaluating histopathological grade of cervical cancer is unresolved. To determine if there is a difference between radiomics features derived from center-slice 2D versus whole-tumor volumetric 3D for ADC measurements in patients with cervical cancer regarding tumor histopathological grade, and systematically assess the impact of the b value on radiomics analysis in ADC quantifications. Prospective. In all, 160 patients with histopathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Conventional and diffusion-weighted MR images (b values = 0, 800, 1000 s/mm2 ) were acquired on a 3.0T MR scanner. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually along the margin of tumor on each slice, and then the center slice of the tumor was selected with naked eyes in the course of whole-tumor segmentation. A total of 624 radiomics features were derived from T2 -weighted images and ADC maps. We randomly selected 50 cases and did the reproducibility analysis. Parameters were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test, Bland-Altman analysis, t-test, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with crossvalidation. In all, 95 radiomics features were insensitive to ROI variation among T2 images, ADC map of b800, and ADC map of b1000 (P > 0.0002). There was a significant statistical difference between the performances of 2D center-slice and 3D whole-tumor radiomics models in both ADC feature sets of b800 and b1000 (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001). Compared with ADC features of b800 (0.3758 ± 0.0118), the model of b1000 ADC features appeared to be slightly lower in overall misclassification error (0.3642 ± 0.0162) (P = 0.0076). Several radiomics features extracted from T2 images and ADC maps were highly reproducible. Whole-tumor volumetric 3D radiomics analysis had a better performance than using the 2D center-slice of tumor in stratifying the histological grade of cervical cancer. A b value of 1000 s/mm2 is suggested as the optimal parameter in pelvic DWI scans. 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:280-290.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.