Abstract

ObjectivesAccurate prediction of prognosis will help adjust or optimize the treatment of cervical cancer and benefit the patients. We aimed to investigate the incremental value of radiomics when added to the FIGO stage in predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with cervical cancer.MethodsThis retrospective study included 106 patients with cervical cancer (FIGO stage IB1–IVa) between October 2017 and May 2019. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 74) and validation cohort (n = 32). All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) prior to treatment. The ITK-SNAP software was used to delineate the region of interest on pre-treatment standard-of-care CT scans. We extracted 792 two-dimensional radiomic features by the Analysis Kit (AK) software. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis and Relief were used to detect the most discriminatory features. The radiomic signature (i.e., Radscore) was constructed via Adaboost with Leave-one-out cross-validation. Prognostic models were built by Cox regression model using Akaike information criterion (AIC) as the stopping rule. A nomogram was established to individually predict the OS of patients. Patients were then stratified into high- and low-risk groups according to the Youden index. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to compare the survival difference between the high- and low-risk groups.ResultsSix textural features were identified, including one gray-level co-occurrence matrix feature and five gray-level run-length matrix features. Only the FIGO stage and Radscore were independent risk factors associated with OS (p < 0.05). The C-index of the FIGO stage in the training and validation cohorts was 0.703 (95% CI: 0.572–0.834) and 0.700 (95% CI: 0.526–0.874), respectively. Correspondingly, the C-index of Radscore was 0.794 (95% CI: 0.707–0.880) and 0.754 (95% CI: 0.623–0.885). The incorporation of the FIGO stage and Radscore achieved better performance, with a C-index of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.738–0.922) and 0.772 (95% CI: 0.615–0.929), respectively. The nomogram based on the FIGO stage and Radscore could individually predict the OS probability with good discrimination and calibration. The high-risk patients had shorter OS compared with the low-risk patients (p < 0.05).ConclusionRadiomics has the potential for noninvasive risk stratification and may improve the prediction of OS in patients with cervical cancer when added to the FIGO stage.

Highlights

  • Cervical cancer is one of the fourth most common female malignancies worldwide [1]

  • The clinical information of patients was collected from electronic medical records, including age, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histological type, differentiation, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and treatment regimens

  • A total of 428 radiomic features were retained after Pearson correction coefficient (PCC) analysis; only six texture features were selected by Relief, including one gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) feature and five gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM) features

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than 80% of patients are typically diagnosed at a locally advanced stage [2]. Despite the fact that outcomes of cervical cancer had been improved with multimodality treatment, around 30%–40% of patients still suffer from recurrence [4]. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage has been established as the most crucial prognostic factor for cervical cancer [5]. The treatment modality choice is mainly based on the FIGO stage and N staging [6]. Clinical outcomes are markedly different among patients with similar stages [6]. Imaging plays an essential role in the pre-treatment evaluation of cervical cancer. Conventional medical images only provide structural information of cancer; it fails to detect the intratumoral heterogeneity associated with treatment response and prognosis [7]. The search for new non-invasive biomarkers with the potential to offer more specific tumor characterization before therapy is urgently needed, which may inform clinicians to make a more individualized treatment plan

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call