Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aims to evaluate digital mammography (DM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE), and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI, individually and combined, for the values in the diagnosis of breast cancer, and propose a visualized clinical-radiomics nomogram for potential clinical uses.MethodsA total of 120 patients were enrolled between September 2017 and July 2018, all underwent preoperative DM, DBT, DCE, and DWI scans. Radiomics features were extracted and selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. A radiomics nomogram was constructed integrating the radiomics signature and important clinical predictors, and assessed with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsThe radiomics signature derived from DBT plus DM generated a lower area under the ROC curve (AUC) and sensitivity, but a higher specificity compared with that from DCE plus DWI. The nomogram integrating the combined radiomics signature, age, and menstruation status achieved the best diagnostic performance in the training (AUCs, nomogram vs. combined radiomics signature vs. clinical model, 0.975 vs. 0.964 vs. 0.782) and validation (AUCs, nomogram vs. combined radiomics signature vs. clinical model, 0.983 vs. 0.978 vs. 0.680) cohorts. DCA confirmed the potential clinical usefulness of the nomogram.ConclusionsThe DBT plus DM provided a lower AUC and sensitivity, but a higher specificity than DCE plus DWI for detecting breast cancer. The proposed clinical-radiomics nomogram has diagnostic advantages over each modality, and can be considered as an efficient tool for breast cancer screening.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer has been a major concern and the second leading cause of cancer death among women [1]

  • There have been researches evaluating the diagnostic capabilities of Digital mammography (DM) [32, 38, 39], digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) [40, 41], Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [42,43,44] separately for detecting breast cancer, all based on subjective visual examinations, and lack of direct and quantitative comparisons of different modalities

  • We found that the radiomics signature derived from DM always showed the worst diagnostic performance in terms of area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity compared with the other individual modalities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer has been a major concern and the second leading cause of cancer death among women [1]. Digital mammography (DM) using 2D technique, as a widely used tool for detecting breast cancer, has a serious limitation that the visibility of lesions may be decreased since they are frequently obscured by dense fibroglandular and other normal tissues within the breast [4], which often leads to a missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis [5]. To address this issue, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) rotates the X-ray tubes in a limited angle, allowing an improved identification of anomalies obscured by normal tissues [6, 7]. The high examination fees of MRI hinder the clinical application in early breast screening

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call