Abstract
Differential diagnosis of brain metastases subtype and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is necessary for treatment decisions. The application of machine learning facilitates the classification of brain tumors, but prior investigations into primary lymphoma and brain metastases subtype classification have been limited. To develop a machine-learning model to classify PCNSL, brain metastases with primary lung and non-lung origin. Retrospective. A total of 211 subjects with pathologically confirmed PCNSL or brain metastases (training cohort 168 and testing cohort 43). A 3.0 T axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo inversion recovery sequence (T1WI-CE), axial T2-weighted fluid-attenuation inversion recovery sequence (T2FLAIR) ASSESSMENT: Several machine-learning models (support vector machine, random forest, and K-nearest neighbors) were built with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) using features from T1WI-CE, T2FLAIR, and clinical. The model with the highest performance in the training cohort was selected to differentiate lesions in the testing cohort. Then, three radiologists conducted a two-round classification (with and without model reference) using images and clinical information from testing cohorts. Five-fold cross-validation was used for model evaluation and calibration. Model performance was assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Twenty-five image features were selected by LASSO analysis. Random forest classifier was selected for its highest performance on the training set with an AUC of 0.73. After calibration, this model achieved an accuracy of 0.70 on the testing set. Accuracies of all three radiologists improved under model reference (0.49 vs. 0.70, 0.60 vs. 0.77, 0.58 vs. 0.72, respectively). The random forest model based on conventional MRI and clinical data can diagnose PCNSL and brain metastases subtypes (lung and non-lung origin). Model classification can help foster the diagnostic accuracy of specialists and streamline prognostication workflow. 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.