Radiologist Worklist Reprioritization Using Artificial Intelligence: Impact on Report Turnaround Times for CTPA Examinations Positive for Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. In patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), timely intervention (e.g., initiation of anticoagulation) is critical for optimizing clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of artificial intelligence (AI)-based radiologist worklist reprioritization on report turnaround times for pulmonary CTA (CTPA) examinations positive for acute PE. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent CTPA before (October 1, 2018-March 31, 2019 [pre-AI period]) and after (October 1, 2019-March 31, 2020 [post-AI period]) implementation of an AI tool that reprioritized CTPA examinations to the top of radiologists' reading worklists if acute PE was detected. EMR and dictation system timestamps were used to determine the wait time (time from examination completion to report initiation), read time (time from report initiation to report availability), and report turnaround time (sum of wait and read times) for the examinations. Times for reports positive for PE, with final radiology reports as reference, were compared between periods. RESULTS. The study included 2501 examinations of 2197 patients (1307 women, 890 men; mean age, 57.4 ± 17.0 [SD] years), including 1335 examinations from the pre-AI period and 1166 from the post-AI period. The frequency of acute PE, based on radiology reports, was 15.1% (201/1335) during the pre-AI period and 12.3% (144/1166) during the post-AI period. During the post-AI period, the AI tool reprioritized 12.7% (148/1166) of examinations. For PE-positive examinations, the post-AI period, compared with the pre-AI period, had significantly shorter mean report turnaround time (47.6 vs 59.9 minutes; mean difference, 12.3 minutes [95% CI, 0.6-26.0 minutes]) and mean wait time (21.4 vs 33.4 minutes; mean difference, 12.0 minutes [95% CI, 0.9-25.3 minutes]) but no significant difference in mean read time (26.3 vs 26.5 minutes; mean difference, 0.2 minutes [95% CI, -2.8 to 3.2 minutes]). During regular operational hours, wait time was significantly shorter in the post-AI than in the pre-AI period for routine-priority examinations (15.3 vs 43.7 minutes; mean difference, 28.4 minutes [95% CI, 2.2-64.7 minutes]) but not for stat- or urgent-priority examinations. CONCLUSION. AI-driven worklist reprioritization yielded reductions in report turnaround time and wait time for PE-positive CTPA examinations. CLINICAL IMPACT. By assisting radiologists in providing rapid diagnoses, the AI tool has potential for enabling earlier interventions for acute PE.