Abstract

Total hip replacements (THR) have been performed in the UK from the 1960s and since then we have seen surgical techniques, the design of implants, and imaging modalities rapidly develop. This paper will aim to review the different complications and imaging appearance which help to evaluate each problem. As for all investigations for bone and joints, a radiograph is the first imaging to be performed for any patient with a THR and can detect a majority of complications. CT is relatively low-cost, simple to perform and easily available making it an excellent tool to supplement radiographs when trying to evaluate a hip prosthesis. Single photon emission computed tomography with CT (SPECT-CT) is an emerging modality which has shown to combine the sensitivity that bone scintigraphy offers with the high specificity of CT. SPECT imaging also has the advantage of showing the bone's metabolic activity and is less prone to metal artifact than Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI has evolved to become an important diagnostic tool for the evaluation of THR in the post-operative period. Optimized pulse sequences and metal artifact reduction techniques have made MRI a useful tool in diagnosis of soft tissue abnormalities and is particularly useful in identifying adverse local tissue reactions in metal on metal implants. CT and MRI are accurate in identifying the diagnosis of most causes of THR complications except infection. Research confirms that leukocyte-marrow scintigraphy is the modality of choice for accurately diagnosing prosthetic joint infection and reassures us of its superiority over other nuclear medicine imaging. However, due to the limited availability and increased costs when performing leukocyte-marrow scintigraphy, CT and SPECT-CT would be a more preferred option when suspecting prosthesis infection. Ultrasound (US) has a limited role in the assessment of most THR complications but can be useful to identify peri-prosthetic fluid collections and the presence of soft tissue sinus tracts. Being aware of the imaging modalities that are available to orthopedic surgeons, and discussing these challenging cases with specialist radiologists will enable optimal management of THR complications.

Highlights

  • Total hip replacements (THR) have been performed in the UK from the 1960s and since we have seen surgical techniques, the design of implants, and imaging modalities rapidly develop [1]

  • The British Orthopedic Association blue book on good practice relating to THR recommends “radiographic follow-up in the form of AP and lateral X-rays at 1 year, 5 years, and each subsequent 5 years following surgery” [6]

  • A study done by Choi et al examining metal artifact reduction (MAR) with multi-acquisition variable-resonance image combination (MAVRIC) SL in patients with THRs concluded that “MAVRIC SL can significantly reduce metal artifact on 3-T Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with 2D FSE” improving anatomical detail on the images and the diagnostic value of the scans

Read more

Summary

Radiological Imaging Evaluation of the Failing Total Hip Replacement

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. Reviewed by: Konstantinos Markatos, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Greece. Specialty section: This article was submitted to Orthopedic Surgery, a section of the journal

Frontiers in Surgery
INTRODUCTION
OVERVIEW OF IMAGING MODALITIES
Plain Radiographs
Nuclear Medicine
Aseptic Loosening and Osteolysis
Instability and Dislocation
Soft Tissue Abnormalities
Component Failure
Heterotopic Ossification
DISCUSSION
PERMISSION TO REUSE AND COPYRIGHT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call