Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of our study was to evaluate the potential and the limitations of standard clinical imaging modalities for the examination of ancient Egyptian canopic jars and the mummified visceral organs (putatively) contained within them.MethodsA series of four ancient Egyptian canopic jars was imaged comparing the three standard clinical imaging modalities: x-rays, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, imaging-data-based volumetric calculations were performed for quantitative assessment of the jar contents.ResultsThe image contrast of the x-ray images was limited by the thickness and high density of the calcite mineral constituting the examined jars. CT scans showed few artefacts and revealed hyperdense structures of organ-specific morphology, surrounded by a hypodense homogeneous material. The image quality of MRI scans was limited by the low amount of water present in the desiccated jar contents. Nevertheless, areas of pronounced signal intensity coincided well with hyperdense structures previously identified on CT scans. CT-based volumetric calculations revealed holding capacities of the jars of 626–1319 cm3 and content volumes of 206–1035 cm3.ConclusionsCT is the modality of choice for non-invasive examination of ancient Egyptian canopic jars. However, despite its limitations, x-ray imaging will often remain the only practicable method for on-site investigations. Overall, the presented radiological findings are more compatible with contained small organ fragments rather than entire mummified organs, as originally expected, with consequent implications for envisioned future sampling for chemical and genetic analysis.

Highlights

  • The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential and the limitations of standard clinical imaging modalities for the examination of ancient Egyptian canopic jars and the mummified visceral organs contained within them

  • Paleoradiology and ancient Egyptian canopic jars The use of medical imaging techniques, such as x-ray radiography, computed tomography (CT), x-ray micro-tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to study bioarchaeological materials can be summarised under the term ‘paleoradiology’

  • This is the case for ancient Egyptian canopic jars, which were used in the funerary setting in ancient Egypt between 2700 and 300 B.C. to separately store and preserve those internal organs that needed to be removed from the body in the course of the mummification procedure to avoid putrefaction, yet were considered essential for the afterlife [14,15,16,17,18,19]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential and the limitations of standard clinical imaging modalities for the examination of ancient Egyptian canopic jars and the mummified visceral organs (putatively) contained within them. Paleoradiology and ancient Egyptian canopic jars The use of medical imaging techniques, such as x-ray radiography, computed tomography (CT), x-ray micro-tomography ( called micro-CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to study bioarchaeological materials can be summarised under the term ‘paleoradiology’. Bioarchaeological specimens may themselves be contained in dense vessels made of stone or ceramic This is the case for ancient Egyptian canopic jars, which were used in the funerary setting in ancient Egypt between 2700 and 300 B.C. to separately store and preserve those internal organs that needed to be removed from the body in the course of the mummification procedure to avoid putrefaction, yet were considered essential for the afterlife [14,15,16,17,18,19]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.