Radioiodine versus radiofrequency ablation to treat autonomously functioning thyroid nodules: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.

Abstract

Radioiodine (RAI) is a well-established first-line therapy for autonomously functioning thyroid nodules (AFTN). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive procedure that has been proposed as an alternative treatment option for hyperthyroidism caused by AFTN. Although RFA has been shown to be useful for reducing nodule volume and improving TSH levels in AFTN, no comprehensive comparative clinical studies have been proposed to evaluate the overall response to RFA treatment. The aim of this comparative systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the response of RAI and RFA treatments in AFTN. A systematic search strategy was applied in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov until July 2023 without time or language restrictions. Studies investigating the response to RAI and/or RFA treatment in AFTN patients 6 and/or 12months after treatment were included. The risk of bias was assessed based on the study design. Random-effect models were used for the meta-analysis. Twenty-three articles (28 reports) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Overall, RAI therapy was found to have a significantly higher treatment response (94%) than RFA (59%), although the volume of AFTNs was reduced to a similar extent. In the direct comparison (n = 3 studies), RFA showed a higher risk of non-response than RAI (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.94-1.63; z = 1.55; p = 0.12). Our results demonstrate the superiority of RAI over RFA in terms of success rates and safety profile and confirm RAI as the first choice for the treatment of AFTNs.