Abstract
Radioimmunoassay was compared to thin-layer and gas--liquid chromatographic methods for detection of methadone in the urine of patients undergoing methadone maintenance therapy as treatment of heroin abuse. With urine samples known to contain methadone, 84% were positive by thin-layer chromatography as compared to 99% positives by the other two methods. This difference is attributed to the difference in sensitivity of the three methods. All three methods gave consistently positive results with urine samples from patients receiving 25 mg of methadone per day or more. With smaller daily doses the percentage of positive results obtained with thin-layer chromatography decreased. Analysis of urine samples not containing methadone showed no incidence of cross reaction of other drugs with the methadone radioimmunoassay. The methadone radioimmunoassay appears to be both sensitive and reliable; however, certain other factors limit its use as a primary screening method.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
