Abstract

The determination of plasma metanephrines (MNs) provides a highly sensitive test for the diagnosis of catecholamine producing tumors. Chromatographic determinations with electrochemical or mass spectrometric detections are the methods of choice, but immunological assays have been developed. This study evaluated the clinical performances of a radioimmunoassay for free MNs in plasma. MNs, normetanephrine (NMN) and metanephrine (MN) and catecholamines, norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) were determined in plasma and urine of 533 patients suspected of catecholamine producing tumor. Urinary and plasma catecholamines and urinary MNs were determined by HPLC using amperometric detection. Plasma MNs were purified by solid phase chromatography and quantified by a specific radioimmunoassay. Fifty-nine patients had tumors (13 paraganglioma and 46 pheochromocytoma) and the diagnosis was excluded in 474 patients. Receiver operator characteristic curves have identified optimal thresholds at 100 pg/mL for plasma NMN (sensitivity 96.6% and specificity 95.8%) and 70 pg/mL for plasma MN (sensitivity 61.0% and specificity 96.8%). These cut-off values were lower than those suggested by the manufacturer (170 and 100 pg/mL, respectively). The sensitivity of combined MNs was similar in plasma (100%) and urine (98%) but higher than that of urinary catecholamines (85%, p<0.001). The specificity of combined MNs in plasma (95%) was higher than urinary MNs (85%, p<0.001) and plasma catecholamines (75%, p<0.001). Plasma-free and urinary-total MNs have a better discriminative power than catecholamines in the diagnosis of catecholamines producing tumors. Using these established cut-offs, measurement of plasma-free MN by radioimmunoassay represents an effective alternative to chromatographic methods.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call