Abstract

Aim: Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) is a method for guiding the excision of occult breast lesions. A radiotracer is injected preoperatively in the tumor. The surgeon can locate the lesion with a gamma probe. It has been recommended that the tissue is resected where the activity falls rapidly. But this cut-off level can fluctuate depending on the user. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two different types of collimation.Materials and methods: To simulate the detection of a radioactive “lesion”, 0.2ml of a solution of 99mTc labeled colloids (4MBq) were deposited at 3cm depth in a chunk of cow muscle. Detection was performed with a gamma probe (GammaSup, Clerad, F) equipped either with a regular or with an additional high-resolution collimator. The response curve was drawn moving laterally the probe on the chunk of cow by 5mm steps. Edges of resection were determined with different cut-off levels (from 5 to 50% of maximum counts by 5% steps).Results: Without additional collimator, the mean distance between injection point and resection edge was 18mm, standard deviation 7.8mm with a range between 11 and 18mm. With additional collimator, the mean distance decreased to 10mm (−44%), standard deviation 4.2mm (−46%) with a range between 6 and 10mm.Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the additional collimator provides more precise and reproductive delineation of the injection site. It should be optimal for the ROLL technique.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call