Radiographic evaluation of immature traumatized incisors following different endodontic treatments.

Abstract

Indirect pulp capping, pulpotomy, and apexification are three common endodontic treatments for immature traumatized incisors. They all affect tooth root development to some extent. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the influence of these treatments on root development of immature permanent incisors following dental trauma. Twenty-one indirect pulp capping, 48 pulpotomy, and 58 apexification cases with a mean age of 8.4±1.0years and median follow up of 12months were included. NIH ImageJ with TurboReg plug-in was used to correct angular differences between the pre-operative and recall periapical radiographs, and to calculate variations of root length, dentin wall thickness, and apical closure. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons was applied to compare the radiographic variations. The type of apical closure was assessed qualitatively and analyzed using Fisher's exact test. The apexification group had a lower trend toward apical closure than the other two groups (P<.05). It also showed thinner dentin wall thickness compared with the pulpotomy group (P=.001). There was no significant difference between pulpotomy and indirect pulp capping in the trend to apical closure (P>.05) or dentin wall thickness (P=.775). There was no significant difference in the variation of root length among the three groups (P=.06). There was a moderate correlation between the treatment and the type of apical closure (Cramer's V Coefficient=.375). Pulpotomy tended to form a normal apical constriction rather than a calcific barrier while apexification showed the opposite inclination. Indirect pulp capping had no specific inclination toward any type of apical closure. Apexification resulted in an abnormal root development mostly by affecting the dentin wall thickness and apical closure. Pulpotomy was beneficial for normal root development of immature traumatized teeth.