Radiographic and Clinical Factors in Pediatric Patients With Surgical Small-bowel Intussusception

Abstract

BackgroundWhen evaluating a pediatric patient with abdominal pain, identification of a small bowel–to–small bowel intussusception (SBI) on radiologic imaging can create a diagnostic dilemma. The clinical significance and need for surgical exploration of SBI is highly variable, as most of them are considered clinically insignificant. We hypothesize that combination of clinical and radiologic factors in an exclusively SBI population will yield factors that guide the clinician in making operative decisions. MethodsA comprehensive database from a pediatric tertiary hospital was reviewed from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016, for any radiographic study mentioning intussusception. Results were reviewed for patients having only SBI (i.e., not ileocolic intussusception), and this comprised the study cohort. The electronic medical records for these patients were reviewed for clinical presentation variables, need for operative intervention, and identification of the intussusception during surgery. Patients with SBI due to enteral feeding tubes were excluded from the study. ResultsWithin the study period, 139 patients were identified with an SBI on radiologic imaging. Univariate analysis yielded numerous clinical and radiologic factors highly predictive of the need for surgical intervention. However, upon multivariate analysis, only a history of prior abdominal surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 7.2; CI: 1.1-46.3), the presence of focal abdominal pain (OR: 22.1; CI: 4.2-116.3), and the intussusception length (cm; OR: 10.6; CI: 10.3-10.8) were correlated with the need for surgical intervention. ConclusionsSBI is a disease process with a highly variable clinical significance. The presence of focal abdominal pain, a history of prior abdominal surgery, and the intussusception length are the greatest predictors of the need for operative intervention. Level of evidenceLevel II.