Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: A study of 281 Western patients

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare survival between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria. Methods: From January 2004 to December 2013 we consecutively and retrospectively included all patients with first occurrence of HCC within Milan criteria receiving SR or RFA as first-line treatment. The cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared after inverse probability weighting (including confounding factor). Results: A total of 281 patients (RFA 178, SR 103) were enrolled. In multivariate Cox regression RFA and SR were not independent predictors of survival or recurrence. The respective weighted 5 years OS and DFS for patients with propensity scores between 0.1–0.9 in the SR and RFA groups were 54–33% and 60–16.9%, P = 0.695 and P = 0.426, respectively. Local tumour progression rate did not differ according to treatment (P = 0.523). Major complication rate was higher in the SR group, P = 0.001. Hospitalisation duration was lower in the RFA group (mean 2.19 days, range 2–7) than in the SR group (mean 10.2 days, range 3–30), P < 0.001. Conclusion: This large Western study has shown that OS and DFS did not differ after RFA (using mainly multipolar devices) and SR, for HCC within the Milan criteria in a European population, with a shorter hospitalisation time and a lower complication rate for RFA.