Radiofrequency ablation versus reoperation for benign thyroid nodules that developed after previous thyroid surgery

Abstract

Purpose To compare the clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus reoperation for benign thyroid nodules that developed after previous thyroid surgery. Methods A total of 53 patients with 53 benign nodules developed after previous thyroid surgery were evaluated in this retrospective study. Eighteen patients were treated by RFA (RFA group) and 35 patients underwent reoperation (reoperation group). The efficacy, safety, thyroid function, blood loss, hospitalization, total treatment time, and cost were compared between the two groups. Results In the RFA group, the mean volume decreased significantly from 12.78 ± 17.57 ml to 0.94 ± 1.01 ml (p = 0.043) with a volume reduction rate of 85.27 ± 14.35% and significant improvement in symptom and cosmetic scores (all p = 0.001). Therapeutic efficacy was achieved with a single session in all thyroid nodules. The total treatment time (6.12 ± 3.17 min vs. 110.26 ± 44.41 min, p < 0.001), blood loss (0 ml vs. 82.58 ± 105.55 ml, p < 0.001) and hospitalization(0 days vs. 9.66 ± 4.28 days, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the RFA group than those in reoperation group, but the costs of treatment were similar(2262.12 ± 221.54 USD vs. 2638.04 ± 1062.90 USD, p = 0.081). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in the reoperation group than in the RFA group(31.43 vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Furthermorre, 65.17% of patients developed hypothyroidism after reoperation, whereas the thyroid function of the patients in the RFA group was unaffected. Conclusion For patients with benign thyroid nodules developed after previous thyroid surgery, RFA can be considered as a safe and effective alternative to reoperation with advantages of maintenance of intact thyroid function and low incidence of complications.