Abstract

Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment option for patients with primary hepatocellular cancer or secondary liver cancer. In selected patients with colorectal liver metastases, for example, a curative resection can provide a 25-40% 5-year disease-free survival rate, accompanied by good quality of life. However, only 10-20% of the patients with liver tumours are suitable for curative procedures, including resection or liver transplantation for early hepatocellular cancer. This low value is due to constraints such as: • tumour size • tumour location • extent of tumour • potential impacts on functional reserve • presence of cirrhosis (in patients with primary tumours) • poor general health. Since major hepatic resections still incur significant morbidity (5-15%) and mortality (1-3%), surgery is usually reserved for patients who are potentially curable. Of those patients who are not candidates for liver resection, a significant number die from ‘liver failure’, caused by tumour replacing functional hepatic parenchyma. In addition, the greater the ‘tumour-load’, the more likely is the chance of lung metastases. Therefore, local tumour control (by whatever means) may offer benefit. Treatment options currently available to patients with unresectable disease include: • tumour size • tumour location • extent of tumour • potential impacts on functional reserve • presence of cirrhosis (in patients with primary tumours) • poor general health. • Systemic or regional chemotherapy and hepatic artery embolization which have a limited effect on disease progression even with the newer drugs available, and are often accompanied by significant morbidity. • Ablative therapies including: chemical ablation (ethanol injection), cryotherapy, and thermal ablation, of which radiofrequency ablation is one example.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call