Abstract

The common source of anthropogenic radioactivity of the polar regions has been global fallout from nuclear weapons testing in the atmosphere. The depositions from this source are at a minimum in the polar regions. Nevertheless polar ecosystems may contain relatively high levels of radioactive contamination. This is true, in particular, for the Arctic regions, which beside global fallout have received significant amounts of radioactivity from a number of other sources. Some of the sources viz discharges from nuclear reprocessing in Western Europe and the Chernobyl accident are well described. Others, such as local fallout from the Novaya Zemlya test site, discharges from nuclear facilities to the Siberian rivers Ob, Yenisey and Lena and dumping of nuclear waste in the Barents and Kara Seas are less well documented, but may contribute significantly to the observed and future contamination of the Arctic.Although the radioecological sensitivity of food products from Arctic regions tend to be higher than we know it from temperature regions, the very low productivity of Nordic regions imply low collective doses from these regions. However, high individual doses from radioactive contamination may be seen in the Arctic as it has been observed for, e.g. reindeer breeders. Radiocaesium is concentrated from lower to higher trophic levels. The marine animals contain orders of magnitude lower 137Cs levels than terrestrial animals in Arctic regions and the transfer of 137Cs is one to two orders of magnitude greater than that of 90Sr to meat of animals.The Antarctic continent is apparently characterized with extremely low levels of anthropogenic radioactive contamination. However data are sparse compared to the Arctic.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call