Abstract
Over time, firms tend to develop relatively stable strategies and organisational arrangements. Radical departure from such patterns is infrequent, yet sometimes necessary for organisational effectiveness and survival. In this study, we examine key factors that facilitate radical strategic and structural change and the performance consequences associated with each type of change. Our analysis of a sample of bank holding companies in the USA over 20 years suggests that radical structural change occurs more frequently than radical strategic change and that radical strategic change positively influences the likelihood that radical structural change will follow, but not the reverse. Results also show that sustained low performance and top executive change facilitate the occurrence of radical strategic but not structural change and that neither type of change exhibits a significant effect on firm profitability and survival. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on organisational change.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.